The explosive row over Super League’s expansion has exposed a deep and damaging rift between the league’s clubs and the Rugby Football League (RFL), revealing that the trust between the two has been broken. The move to 14 teams is now secondary to a larger crisis of confidence in the governing body’s leadership, transparency, and competence.
The initial crack in the trust appeared during the July vote on expansion. Clubs now claim they were asked to put their faith in the RFL’s verbal assurances without being given the hard-copy financial plans needed for proper scrutiny. This perceived lack of respect for their role as stakeholders was the beginning of the breakdown.
That crack has since widened into a chasm. The RFL’s subsequent failure to share the minutes of that meeting or to answer repeated requests for financial modelling has been interpreted by some clubs as a sign of bad faith. It has fostered a climate of suspicion, where the clubs no longer trust that the RFL is acting in their best interests or being honest about the risks involved.
This broken trust is now the primary obstacle to the expansion. The clubs’ financial fears, while significant, are amplified by their lack of faith in the RFL’s ability to manage the process. The “rushed” timeline and “non-robust” vetting process are seen as further evidence of a governing body that cannot be trusted to handle such a critical task.
Rebuilding this trust is now the RFL’s biggest challenge. The informal crisis meetings are not just about debating the merits of a 14-team league; they are about trying to repair a fractured relationship. If the RFL cannot restore the clubs’ faith in its governance, it won’t just lose the battle over expansion—it may lose the ability to lead the sport effectively at all.